Saturday 25 October 2014

Casual abuse and inexplicable inventiveness: The plight of the English Language



The kids who drove this often medalled, but I've never seen them at the Olympics...


During the second half of Man United v Everton a few weeks ago, Michael Owen managed to complete a sentence that started in the present tense, moved backwards into the past tense, and then somehow returned to the present.

My response, partly fuelled by the tension that comes from watching any United game these days, was as follows: “Congratulations for butchering the English language, Michael, top effort.”

Before proceeding I’d quickly like to point out I have no hatred for Owen, and while his co-commentary isn’t my cup of tea, he isn’t the only one I struggle to listen to, and I would take him every day ahead of Niall Quinn.

Rather than Owen-bashing, this blog is intended as a quick look at the English Language, and the casual but violent abuse it faces on a day-to-day basis.

Firstly, it is a wonderful opportunity to reference and refer to Weird Al Yankovic’s work of genius, Word Crimes.

Utilising the music and lyric-pattern of Robin Thicke’s Blurred Lines it is as creative with the language as it is abusive of those who have so much trouble using it correctly. If you haven’t heard it yet, listen to it now!


One pet-hate of mine that has made its way into the conscience of Weird Al is the tendency of many to describe things as being LITERALLY something, when they literally aren’t.

Describing yourself as literally dying when hung-over or aching a bit is so frustrating that I metaphorically explode.

Equally common is the trend of turning every word into a verb. A tutor on my Masters course was particularly aggravated by the now globally accepted action of ‘medalling’ at a sporting event.

The verb ‘to medal’ has now become accepted, but this could be a dangerous precedent that sees people turn any word they like into a verb.

Banter is a horrific word anyway, used to cover all manner of sins, but turn it into a verb and it's even worse.

“We’re bantering…” Let that one sink in.

So while ‘medalling’ is not an offensive word on its own, maybe its definition should go back to being what Scooby Doo and the rest of Mystery Inc. got up to.

Other words to be regularly used to hideous effect are babe, baby and babes. These are not terms of endearment, however regularly Danny Dyer tries to convince us by using them to address his onscreen wife on Eastenders.

‘Babe’ was a pig. ‘Baby’ is an infant that hasn’t yet become a toddler. And ‘babes’ is the plural word for attractive women used for a period in the 90s, usually on American TV programmes, when ‘chicks’ went out of fashion.    

There are numerous words that are shortened bizarrely or reemployed with entirely new meanings for no apparent reason.

For example, if you must shorten the word legend, then that would be spelt leg, not ledge. Sachin Tendulkar is a legend, but to my knowledge he has never formed part of a window, so he isn’t a ledge.

Cupboards can occasionally be bare, but contrary to the belief of many, they can’t be bare bare. Why bare is now used as a replacement for very I have no idea, there is nothing wrong with the word very to my knowledge.

Language does evolve, and I’m not advocating a return to Shakespearian English by any stretch of the imagination, but I don’t see any of the above, or anything uttered by Joey Essex as an improvement on what we have persevered with for a while now.


Finally, I fully understand that if there are any spelling mistakes, typing errors or some questionable grammar hiding among these lines, it would make me a hypocrite as well as a miserable git.

Friday 24 October 2014

Just how big can the BIGGEST game in the world get..?

What big teeth you have Grandma...

“The biggest game in club football has got even bigger” 


Sky Sports’ reaction to Luis Suarez making his debut in El Clasico this weekend, and their building up of a game they just happen to have exclusively live coverage of in the UK.

The inclusion of the man on his way back from a third biting ban does of course improve the spectacle, and it would be hard to argue that Real Madrid v Barcelona isn’t special.

But… Considering they are determined to call it the BIGGEST game in club football, about 45 times a day, it would be nice to know exactly how they quantify that.

Is it the audience figures, because that might largely be because everybody feels the need to watch a game that is being advertised in such a way, a not so vicious cycle… 

The other noteworthy thing about Real v Barca is that Sky, and many other outlets, spend the week leading up to the game asking whether Lionel Messi or Cristiano Ronaldo are the best in the world, as if this time, unlike the previous 20, we will stumble across the formula that finally answers the question.

The question is boring and repetitive, and surely there is something else to discuss if this game is as big as they claim.

Well apparently there is, but this one doesn’t make a great deal of sense either…


Sky Sports News HQ’s poll of the day today posed the question, who’s the better summer signing… James Rodriguez or Luis Suarez?

When rating a signing, two of the things I would consider would be the value for money and the impact of the player on their new team.

As they are the fifth and third most expensive signings of all time respectively, even in the world of inflated transfers fees in which we live, value is a hard comparison to make, so we’ll have to stick to impact then.

Oh hang on a second… Suarez hasn’t played for his new team yet has he..?

Another ridiculous comment of El Clasico note can be attributed to Guillem Balague, also of Sky Sports fame.

On their website he has compiled a combined XI of Real and Barca players, pretty harmless and formulaic build up content for a big game.

At the end of the team he suggests that readers might disagree with his selection, “but then isn’t that what makes football the best game in the world?”

I’m a huge football fan, but I’d suggest that talking points do exist in other sports too, and Guillem may struggle to believe it, but not only do people quite enjoy sports like cricket, they manage to have debates and disagreements over selection in that too... who knew?!

However, none of the Clasico build up compares to the head-shakingly pointless job Gary Cotterill was given ahead of Barcelona’s Champions League game with Ajax.

He found some Dutch fans in a bar then attempted to obtain a score prediction from one of them while all the others sang over his interview.

When Gary was told the game would finish 2-2 he tried to point out that Barcelona are quite good.

If this wasn’t already cringe worthy enough, he concluded the interview by tipping the poor bloke’s beer all over him.

Nobody covers European football quite like Sky…